Winph Online Casino
- owin online casino Klay Thompson sets 3s record for Dallas d
- jili365 Alaska Airlines completes acquisition of Hawaiian Ai
- sabong live Trump Insults Harris’s Mental Fitness, Adding to
- betmnl online casino Congress urged to grant public access t
- tongits go Erling Haaland: Norwegian Striker Scores 100th Go
- pgbet Does Kangana Ranaut Deserve Our Fairness?
- jili365 10 gruesome, blood-drenched movies for gore enjoyers
- taya777 Mavy Legaspi happy for Kyline Alcantara after dating
- betmnl online casino Ex-BARMM local gov’t minister
- dbx 777 Commentary: Is Singapore a resilient city?
- Updated:2024-10-09 09:33 Views:156 More from our inbox:Trump’s ‘Audacity’ to Blame Democrats for Assassination AttemptsAn Afghan Woman’s PleaHow I Teach the BiblePressure on High School StudentsImageCredit...Daniel Ribar for The New York Times
To the Editor:sabong online betting
Re “We Cannot Go On Like This,” by Gail Collins and Bret Stephens (The Conversation, Sept. 17):
Mr. Stephens’s conundrum about whom he will be voting for on the surface sounds like the reasonable position of a conservative thinker. He says he’s not voting for Donald Trump, but he continues to be less than convinced that Kamala Harris is the candidate he can vote for and gives a string of reasons for that.
Mr. Stephens is a journalist and must understand that in a tight race, the question is not about whether he can agree with the majority of Ms. Harris’s positions. There are only two candidates; thus the real question is, Who is likely to do less harm to American democracy?
The answer here is clear, as I assume Mr. Stephens will agree. Unfortunately, with his hemming and hawing, he provides a publicly acceptable stance for people to withhold their vote for whatever reason: They cannot vote for a woman, or a Democrat or someone who hasn’t proven herself (huh?). And every vote withheld from Kamala Harris turns into a vote for Donald Trump.
That’s the mathematics. Time to get off the fence, Mr. Stephens, and do your part as a public influencer to save democracy in America!
Urs-Rainer von ArxNew York
To the Editor:
Re “Kamala Harris Hasn’t Yet Earned My Vote,” by Bret Stephens (column, Sept. 18):
Mr. Stephens proposed several policy questions that he would like to see asked of Kamala Harris. All were valid and substantive, worthy of being proposed. What he left out is proposing that they also be asked of Donald Trump.
If Mr. Trump has worthwhile answers to them we should be told. So far Mr. Trump has spent his energies promoting false claims, repeating and even exaggerating internet lies, and hurling insults, none of which address substantive issues that the next president will face.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.sabong online betting
- betmnl online casino Congress urged to grant public access to final 2025 national budget talks2024-11-14
- 63win ‘Orphan 3’ officially in the works; Isabelle Fuhrman to return as lead2024-11-06
- owin online casino Pinoy gets West Point valor award2024-10-23
- starbet777 Time To Fly 2024 travel fair offers discounted flight tickets, lucky draws and celebrity appearances2024-10-20
- wstar33 Amazon Great Indian Sale 2024: Get Min 50% Off on Kitchenware and Appliances2024-10-10
- arenaplus Commentary: Dear travel influencers, ‘real’ Singapore is sweaty and off the social media hype2024-10-08